Classical Theism

Why not reads its proponents? Never read Daniel Dennett, but I suppose "Consciousness explained" is important from the POV of eliminative materialists.

Well for the proponents, maybe really read Rosenberg. I really have to examine how much a naturalist is forced to follow him, because if he argues persuasively, then I´d claim it is the best reductio ad absurdum against naturalism (Michael Reas "World without Design" is also pretty good). Another proponent would perhaps be Thomas Metzinger.
I´m currently reading some Stephen Mumford, not really naturalist, but atheist enough (lol).

Arguing FOR naturalism convincingly is really hard, critiquing theistic arguments seems way easier. Best example of that was Mackies endorsement of Dawkins "The Selfish Gene". The debate between J.L. Mackie vs Mary Midgley on that topic is really worth to read.