Classical Theism

Your biggest challenge, whatever you choose, is going to be giving people a reason to come here instead of going to the rather large groups on Facebook. I've discovered over the last few years that most people don't actually care that much about freedom of expression.

By the way, do you have a first name I can call you? It doesn't have to be your actual one. I just get tired of calling people "Mighty", "Flying", and things like that. It's so uncivilized.

>Well, what you do is up to you.

I'm the new guy here so I think we have to decide democratically.
I agree somewhat. I didn't know about 'Classical Theism' too, but I also didn't know about the terms you're talking about. But that might also be because English is my second language.
After reading https://www.encyclopedia.com/religion/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/scholastic-philosophy , I'm more convinced and you're right.

I hope you keep posting on this forum

I'll add the options to the list in the OP, and if possible make a poll out of it.
If nobody responds, I'll go with scholastic-philosophy.com or scholasticphilosophy.org

Well, what you do is up to you. I'm inactive and "retired". But I always felt that "classical theism" was both too specific and too broad. It's too specific because almost nobody outside of certain relatively small philosophical circles and parts of analytic philosophy of religion even know what it means. So, nobody knows to look for it. It's too broad because it doesn't really give people much to identify with, and marketing for groups like this is often a matter of identifying a niche (which, preferably, lacks much competition) and focusing on it. (When I called it "bland", I was referring to the "too broad" part of this.)

That goes into a deeper question on what would be the purpose of this forum. It seems to me that we're discussing Theism mostly from a Christian perspective, philosophy, and scripture.
Is the therm 'Scholastic' covering all that? Also, why do you think 'classical theism' is too bland?

We can also remove 'Classical' from the name and get the domain theismforum.com (which is still available).

Boy, I remember wracking my brain over that issue for awhile--it's good to see I've contributed something useful to the age old canons of the elder forum. I'll need to dust off Feser's book again and have a look into how he spells out the argument precisely. I've taken a hiatus from philosophy for the past several months and I'm starting to realize it wasn't a very good choice. I feel like my mind is goop.